SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Pat) 1637

SHIVAJI PANDEY
Sanjay Jain – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


ORDER :

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

2. In this case, petitioners are challenging the order of cognizance dated 15th October, passed in Complaint Case No. 1434 © of 2001 for offences u/s 406, 420, 120(B) IPC.

3. In this case, it has been alleged in the complaint petition, on 2nd March 1998 petitioners were appointed as C & F Agent of Rajasthan of M/s Dhriti Agro Farms Pvt. Ltd. by O.P. No. 2 and handed over the letter of appointment at the residence of the in-laws of the complainant. As per the complaint petition, the complainant was to make investment through raw materials/finished goods of Rs.17.5 lacs at any point of time and the accused persons (petitioners) were to supply the finished goods. It has further been alleged that the O.P. No. 2 had made several payments for the supply of raw materials to different suppliers of accused-petitioner on their instruction, as per the statement of account, complainant, O.P. No. 2 had already paid Rs. 30,24,950.00 which was outstanding against the accused persons as on 15th June 2000. He has further alleged that the accused persons had confirmed the balance amount of Rs.14,46,901.30 p as outstanding against them







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top