Shivaji Pandey, J.

1. Both the cases are inter-connected to each other and as such both cases with consent of parties have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.

2. Writ petitioners of C.W.J.C. No. 4239 of 2013 (Govind Tiwari & others v. State of Bihar and others) are opposing the prayer of writ petitioners of C.W.J.C. No.22702 of 2012 (Vijay Prasad and others v. The State of Bihar & other) on the ground that petitioners Vijay Prasad and others have wrongly been selected/appointed on Class IV posts by the Collector, Jehanabad which are meant for their regularisation. They are daily wages employees in the Irrigation Department working at Waterways Division, Udersthan, Jehanabad, in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka and others v. Uma Devi (3) and others, reported (2006) 4 SCC 1 they should be regularised in their services and the efforts of Vijay Prasad and other for purported encroachment have been objected by Govind Tiwari and others.

3. For the disposal of this case whenever this Court would feel necessary, would mention the facts of either of writ petition at the appropriate facts.