SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Pat) 419

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH
Budhu Yadav son of Sadhu Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, Mr. Vivekanand Singh, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

A common order dated 26.10.1997 passed by the Director Consolidation, Bihar, in Revision Case No. 260 of 1994 (Kesho Yadav and Others vs. Budhu Yadav and Others) and Revision Case No. 691 of 1994 (Budhu Yadav and Others vs. Kesho Yadav and Others), both filed under Section 35 of the Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Consolidation Act’), is under challenge in both these writ applications filed by the same petitioners and, therefore, both the matters have been heard together and are being disposed of by present common judgment and order.

2. I have heard Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners assisted by Mr. Vivekanand Singh and Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.5. Learned State counsel has also assisted the Court.

3. It is to be noted, at the very outset, that C.W.J.C. No. 15404 of 2004 was filed on 08.12.2004, after more than seven years of passing of the impugned order. The petitioners thereafter chose to file

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top