SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Pat) 512

ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH
Mundrika Ram S/o Late Bhikhari Ram – Appellant
Versus
Maheshwar Prasad Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate, Mr. Dewendra Narayan Singh, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar , learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. In the instant application preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 04.10.2018 passed by the learned Sub-Judge, Sonepur in Execution Case No.01 of 2016 whereby the petition dated 22.06.2018 filed by the petitioner to stay further proceeding in the execution case has been declined.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the learned Sub-Judge, Sonepur while passing the impugned order has grossly erred by declining to stay the further proceeding of the execution case more particularly when admittedly the suit land is a residential house. He submitted that against the judgment and decree which has been passed by the appellate court on 15.01.2018, Second Appeal No.202 of 2018 has already been filed before this Court, which is pending adjudication. He submitted that once the appeal has been filed and is pending before this Court, it was incumbent upon the executing court to stay the further proceedings in the execution case. He pleaded that the executing court has completely overlooked the provisions prescribed under Order 2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top