AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
Prahlad Rai – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2.
2. The petitioners have moved the Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for the following relief:
3. The allegation against the petitioners is of taking money by way of bribe for providing job of T.T. in the Railways to the opposite party no. 2, but the same was not done and money also not returned and in Panchyati, it is alleged that the petitioners had agreed to transfer land in favour of the opposite party no. 2, in lieu of the money taken by them, but despite the opposite party no. 2 buying stamp paper, the transfer was not made by the petitioners.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the present is absolutely a false and frivolous case as they have not taken any money after
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.