JUDGMENT :

The petitioner, who at the relevant time was an Aanganbari Sahayika has challenged the order dated 13.02.2010 (Annexure-3) passed by the District Programme Officer, Madhubani whereby her services has been terminated as also the order dated 18.06.2010 (Annexure4) passed by the District Magistrate, Madhubani in Aanganbari Appeal No. 77/2010/26/2010-11, affirming the termination order referred to above.

2. It appears from the records that a complaint was made by the husband of the petitioner in his capacity as Ward Member against one Mamta Devi, an Aanganbari Sewika in the same centre where the petitioner was posted and dispensed with her engagement as Aanganbari Sahayika.

3. The District Programme Officer, while hearing the complaint against aforesaid Mamta Devi, though made by the husband of the petitioner, came to the conclusion that the centre was not being run properly because of the interpersonal dispute between the petitioner (Aanganbari Sahayika) and aforesaid Mamta Devi who worked as Aanganbari Sewika. The District Programme Officer, therefore, by order dated 13.02.2010 came to the conclusion that the complaint against Mamta Devi was motivated and perhaps the responsi