RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
Abhisek Kundu – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
2. Petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: -
"I. For direction to the Respondents to release the Four Wheeler vehicle Maruti Swift ZXL bearing Registration No.WB74 AX-9766 in favour of the petitioner which had been seized in connection with Special Case No. 81/2020 instituted for the offence under section 30(a), 56(b) Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
II. For any other relief or reliefs to which the petitioner is found entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case."
3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: - " .."
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the petition be disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 22.12.2020, passed in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9592 of 2020 (Dharmendra Mahto versus The State of Bihar).
5. In the case of Dharmendra Mahto (supra) this Court has referred and discussed all the previous case laws on the subject. Some of the judgments rendered in similar matters are as under:-
(i) Md. Shaukat Ali Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.,2020 3
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.