SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Pat) 629

AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
Manoj Marandi @ Manoj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Bharat Lal, Advocate, Amit Kumar Rakesh, Advocate, Jay Ram Prasad, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. - The matter has been heard via video conferencing.

2. Heard Mr. Bharat Lal, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. Amit Kumar Rakesh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (hereinafter referred to as the 'APP') for the State and Mr. Jay Ram Prasad, learned counsel for the informant.

3. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Jhajha PS Case No. 236 of 2019 dated 15.08.2019, instituted under Sections 323, 354(B), 307, 376, 506, 509, 366, 313 and 394/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

4. The allegation against the petitioner is that he had established physical relationship with the informant in the year 2012 and even after getting a job in the BSF in the year 2013, he had maintained the relationship and had promised to marry her and in the year 2018, they had cohabited and when the informant had conceived, she was made to abort and thereafter when she had gone to the house of the petitioner, initially she was told to keep quiet, but later, she was abused, threatened and assaulted and was told that she should forget about the whole thing and they would get the petitioner married somewhere else.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that aft

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top