SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Pat) 454

AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
Rajesh Kumar, Male – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Pramod Kumar, Advocate, Jharkhandi Upadhyay, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. - The matter has been heard via video conferencing.

2. Heard Mr. Pramod Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (hereinafter referred to as the 'APP') for the State.

3. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Danapur PS Case No. 45 of 2020 dated 16.01.2020, instituted under Sections 25(1-B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, 1959.

4. This is the second attempt for bail by the petitioner as earlier such prayer was rejected by judgment and order dated 03.07.2020 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 20904 of 2020.

5. As per the allegation, a loaded countrymade pistol along with a magazine having five live cartridges have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 17.01.2020. Further, it was submitted that other co-accused who were also arrested along with the petitioner and from them also there was recovery of firearms, have been granted bail by the Court below itself.

7. Learned APP submitted that from the petitioner, there is recovery of countrymade pistol and live cartridges.

8. Havin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top