SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Pat) 310

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Sanjay Karol, S. Kumar, JJ.
Sanmarg Projects Private Ltd - Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar - Respondent
Civil Writ Jurisdiction No. 8653 of 2021
Decided On : 01-07-2021

Advocates Appeared:
Uday Pratap Singh, Advocate, Manoj Kumar Ambastha, Advocate, Manisha, Advocate, Vivek Prasad, Advocate

The court emphasized the need for the appeal to be decided on merits, without considering delay, and ordered no coercive steps during the appeal.

Headnote:

Writ of Certiorari - Tax Appeal - The court quashed the orders raising a demand against the petitioner and attached amount from the bank account, directed the appeal to be decided on merits, and ordered de-freezing of the bank account.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought relief to quash orders raising a demand and attaching funds from the bank account.

Finding of the Court:

The court quashed the orders raising the demand and attaching funds, directed the appeal to be decided on merits, and ordered de-freezing of the bank account.

Issues: Validity of orders raising demand and attaching funds, delay in filing the appeal, and coercive steps during appeal.

Ratio Decidendi: The appeal should be decided on merits without considering the delay, no coercive steps should be taken during the appeal, and the bank account should be de-frozen.

Final Decision: The court quashed the orders raising the demand and attaching funds, directed the appeal to be decided on merits, and ordered de-freezing of the bank account.

JUDGMENT

Sanjay Karol, C.J. - Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):

"(a) That this application is being filed for issuance of a writ in the nature of writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order/ direction for quashing the orders dt. 05.03.2020 and 01.03.2021 passed by Respondent no. 5 and 3 by which a demand of Rs. 28,77,243.20/- Twenty eight Lakh Seventy Seven thousand, Two hundred forty three and paisa twenty only) was raised against the petitioner and subsequent appeal has been rejected respectively.

(b) That, this application is further being filed for quashing order dt. 18.01.2021 passed by Respondent no. 4 by which an amount of Rs. 25,32140.52/- ( Twenty five Lakh Thirty thousand one hundred forty and paisa fifty tow only) has been attached from the bank account of the petitioner being operated vide A/c No. 50149821471, Allahabad Bank, Main branch, Budh Marg, Patna -800001."

2. It is brought to our notice that vide orders dt. 05.03.2020 and 01.03.2021 passed by Respondent no. 5 and 3 a demand of Rs. 28,77,243.20/- (Twenty eight Lakh Seventy Seven thousand, Two hundred forty three and paisa twenty only) was raised against the petitioner and subsequent appeal has been rejected respectively and vide order dt. 18.01.2021 passed by Respondent no. 4 an amount of Rs. 25,32140.52/- ( Twenty five Lakh Thirty thousand one hundred forty and paisa fifty tow only) has been attached from the bank account of the petitioner being operated vide A/c No. 50149821471, Allahabad Bank, Main branch, Budh Marg, Patna -800001.

3. Learned counsel for the Revenue, states that he has no objection if the matter is remanded to the Appellate Authority for deciding the appeal afresh. Also, while considering and deciding the appeal, the ground of delay shall not be taken into account and the appeal shall be decided on merits. Also, during pendency of the appeal, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner.

4. Statement accepted and taken on record.

5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties as also perused the record made available, we dispose of the present petition in the following mutually agreeable terms:-

(a) We quash and set aside the orders dt. 05.03.2020 and 01.03.2021 passed by Respondent no. 5 and 3 by which a demand of Rs. 28,77,243.20/- (Twenty eight Lakh Seventy Seven thousand, Two hundred forty three and paisa twenty only) was raised against the petitioner and subsequent appeal has been rejected respectively and order dt. 18.01.2021 passed by Respondent no. 4.

(b) We accept the statement of the petitioner that ten per cent of the total amount, being condition prerequisite for hearing of the appeal, already stands deposited. If that were so, the appeal shall be decided on merits. However, if the amount is not deposited for whatever reason(s), same shall be done before the next date;

(c) This deposit shall be without prejudice to the respective rights and contention of the parties and subject to the order passed by the Appellate Authority. However, if it is ultimately found that the petitioner's deposit is in excess, this shall be done within a period of seven days from the date of account being made operational. ;

(d) We also direct for de-freezing/de-attaching of the bank account(s) of the writ-petitioner, if attached in reference to the proceedings, subject matter of present petition. This shall be done immediately.

(e) Petitioner undertakes to appear before the Appellate Authority i.e. Additional Commissioner, State Tax (Appeal), Patna West Division, Patna on 1st of September, 2021 at 10:30 A.M., if possible through digital mode;

(f) The Appellate Authority shall condone the delay in filing the appeal and decide the appeal on merits after complying with the principles of natural justice;

(g) Opportunity of hearing shall be afforded to the parties to place on record all essential documents and materials, if so required and desired;

(h) During pendency of the appeal, no coercive steps shall be taken against the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top