SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Pat) 287

AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
Ajeet Kumar Yadav @ Ajeet Kumar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Javed Aslam, Advocate, Md Aslam Ansari, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. - The matter has been heard via video conferencing.

2. Heard Mr. Javed Aslam, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Md. Aslam Ansari, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (hereinafter referred to as the 'APP') for the State.

3. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Hussainganj PS Case No. 48 of 2020 dated 10.06.2020, instituted under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and 30(a) and 41(i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act').

4. The allegation against the petitioner is that from the joint house of his and his brother, 234 litres of liquor was recovered from near the staircase.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that though as per the allegation, the recovery is from the house of the petitioner and his brother, but in the seizure list, it has been shown that the recovery is from the house of his brother, who is also co-accused, and not the petitioner. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner and his brother are separate as there has been partition between them and the place from where recovery has been made belongs to his brother i.e., co-accused Sanjeet Kumar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top