SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Pat) 276

AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
Rajendra Pasi @ Rajendar Pasi – Appellant
Versus
Suresh Pasi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Javed Aslam, Advocate, Satya Nand Shukla, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. - The matter has been heard via video conferencing.

2. Heard Mr. Javed Aslam, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (hereinafter referred to as the 'APP') for the State.

3. The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with G.B. Nagar PS Case No. 57 of 2020 dated 06.03.2020, instituted under Sections 30(a)/34/36/38/41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act').

4. The allegation against the petitioners is that when the police on information went to the house of petitioner no. 1, 16.5 litres of liquor was recovered whereas from the house of petitioner no. 2, 10 litres of country made liquor was recovered.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the so called recovery is not from the conscious possession of the petitioners and none of his family members were present. It was submitted that only on suspicion they have been named and further that they have no criminal antecedent.

6. Learned APP submitted that as per the allegation, the recovery being from the house of the petitioners, the bar of Section 76(2) of the Act would apply as an o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top