SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Pat) 225

AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
Sanjeev Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ritesh Kumar, Advocate, Prasoon Sinha, Advocate, Uday Sharan Singh, Advocate, Rakesh Kumar Chandra, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. - This matter has been taken up via video-conferencing.

2. The instant case has been assigned after being specially notified under orders of Hon'ble the Chief Justice.

3. Heard Mr. Ritesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners; Mr. Uday Shankar Saran Singh, learned Government Pleader 19 along with Mr. Rakesh Kumar Chandra, learned Assistant Counsel to GP 19 for the State and Mr. Prasoon Sinha, learned counsel for the Muzaffarpur Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the 'Corporation').

4. The petitioners have moved the Court by preferring the present writ petition for the following reliefs:

"i. For quashing letter dated 05.04.2021 issued under the signature the Respondent no. 5, The Municipal Commissioner, Muzaffarpur Municipal Corporation whereby and whereunder the petitioners have been directed to vacate their respective shops by 10.04.2021.

ii. For commanding the respondents to make alternative arrangement at some other place, since the petitioners are doing their business for the last 20-30 years in the shops which are proposed to be demolished without any justifiable basis.

iii. For commanding and directing the respondents to not pro

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top