SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Pat) 754

P.B.BAJANTHRI
Mohit Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Ranjan Kumar Singh, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. S.D.Sanjay (Adsg), for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. In the instant petition the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-

"(i) For issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 09.09.2014 (Annexure No. 3 to the instant writ petition) passed by the Commandant, 51st Bn., SSB, whereby and where under an offer of Appointment for the post of Constable (GD) has been issued to this petitioner by Assistant Director (Pers-II), FHQ, SSB, New Delhi vide Memorandum No. 2/31/12/SSB (SSCJ/Rectt. CT/Pers-II/17764-17766 dated 16.05.2012 with the direction to report to the Commandant, 24th SSB, Bathnaha (Bihar) for further joining in 51st Bn. SSB, Sitamarhi-II on or before 14.06.2012 has been cancelled by saying that this candidate is not fit for appointment of SSB in terms of MAH UO No. 1.45020/6/2010-Pers-II dated 01.02.2012 alleging therein that a police case no. 1498/2001, registered U/s 147/332/353/323/504/506 of Indian Penal Code is laying pending against him although this petitioner has been equated or discharged from the said case in question and the same would not be disqualification of service of the petitioner.

(ii) For issuance of writ in the nature of ce

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top