S.KUMAR
Dilip Kumar Agrawal, Son of Late Girdhari Lal Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
Kamakhya Prasad, Son of Late Kunj Bihari Lal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
I.A. No. 2 of 2021 in C.R. No. 172 of 2018
I.A. No. 3 of 2021 in C.R. No. 172 of 2018
I.A. No. 2 of 2021 has been filed on behalf of petitioner under Order 22 Rule 4 of C.P.C. whereas I.A. No. 3 of 2021 has been filed by opposite party under Order 22 Rule 10A of C.P.C. for expunging the name of opposite party no. 1 Kamakhya Prasad, who died during pendency of this revision application on 31.08.2020 leaving behind following as his legal heirs and representatives.
(ii) Prakash Chandra (Son)
(iii) Rajani Prasad (Daughter)
(iv) Dr. Prawan Chandra (Son) (Opposite party no. 2)
2. As opposite party no. 2 legal heir and successor of deceased opposite party no. 1 is already on record, revision petition will not abate.
3. Eviction suit was filed on the ground of personal necessity of opposite party no. 2 and he is the owner of tenanted premises, as such, right to sue survives upon him, under such circumstances there is no need to substitute other legal heir and representatives of deceased opposite party no. 1 as they have no right, title and interest in suit property.
I.A. No. 2 of 2021 is accordingly disposed of.
Civil Revision No. 172 of 2018
4. This civil revisio
M/s Bata India Ltd. vs. Dr. Md. Qamruzzama
Md. Ehsam Rasul Vs. Munni Devi
Shakuntala Devi Vs. Sajjan Kumar Bajoria
Shri Vinod Kumar Gupta & Anr. Vs. Smt. Pushpa Devi & Anr.
Savitri Sahay Vs. Sachidanand Prasad
Food Corporation of India & Ors. vs. Vishun Properties & Enterprises & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.