SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Pat) 873

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
SANDEEP KUMAR, J.
SHIV KUMAR S/o Late Sanjay Pandit – Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar - Opposite Partys
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38807 of 2020
Decided On : 15-12-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Pramod Kumar Verma
For the Opposite Partys : Mr. A.G.

The duty of social media platforms and law enforcement agencies to report and take action against objectionable materials on social media, and the court's authority to direct investigation and action in cyber crime cases.

Headnote:

Cyber Crimes - Social Media Abuse - Duty of Social Media Platforms and Economic Offences Unit (EOU) - Court directs EOU to register FIR, investigate objectionable materials, and take suitable action against the offender and persons involved in posting objectionable posts.

Fact of the Case:

The court is dealing with cyber crimes involving abusive posts against judges and government officials on social media platforms. The EOU is directed to investigate and take action against the offender and persons involved in posting objectionable posts.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the social media platforms and the EOU failed in their duty to report and take action against objectionable materials being uploaded on their platforms. The local police also failed to investigate a cyber crime case, leading the court to direct the EOU to investigate and take it to its logical conclusion.

Issues: Abusive posts against judges and government officials on social media, failure of social media platforms and EOU to report and take action, and failure of local police to investigate a cyber crime case.

Ratio Decidendi: The duty of social media platforms and the EOU to report and take action against objectionable materials, and the court's authority to direct the EOU to investigate and take action in cyber crime cases.

Final Decision: The EOU is directed to register an FIR, constitute an expert team, investigate objectionable materials and the offences committed, and take suitable action under the law against the offender and persons involved in posting objectionable posts. The EOU is also granted one month's time to file a report in the cyber crime case before the court.

ORDER :

This Court is dealing with cyber crimes in this proceeding and therefore is taking up a very disturbing matter.

2. Mr. Manu Tripurari, learned counsel, is appointed as Amicus Curaie in this case.

3. The office is directed to add Economic Offices Unit (EOU), Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, Youtube, Whatsup, Messenger, Meta as opposite party nos. 4 to 11 to this application.

4. A lawyer Dinesh has been abusing the Judges of the Supreme Court including the then Chief Justice of India, Patna High Court Judges as well as the Union Law Minister and other dignitaries. This abuse has been posted on various social media platforms. Though under the law, the abuse is required to be reported to the police but the social media platforms have failed in their duty, therefore this Court is taking up the matter.

5. The Government of Bihar has come out with memo no. 13 dated 21/01/2021 by which the Additional Director General, Economic Offences Unit, Government of Bihar, Patna, has issued a direction for taking action against the persons who are making objectionable comments using foul languages against Government Ministers, Members of Parliament, Member of Legislative Assembly and other Government officials. Though this memo was issued on 21.01.2021 but till date EOU has failed to take any action against the person/persons making objectionable comments and posts on various social media platforms against the then Chief Justice of India, Supreme Court Judges, Patna High Court Judges including Ex Chief Justice of Patna High Court and the then Union Law Minister. EOU has to be reminded that they are duty bound to take suitable action against the persons who are continuously abusing Chief Justice of India, Supreme Court Judges, Patna High Court Judges including Ex Chief Justice of Patna High Court and the then Union Law Minister on various social media platforms. Social media platforms have also failed in their duty to report such type of objectionable materials being uploaded on their social sites/apps to the EOU.

6. The EOU is directed to register an F.I.R., constitute an expert team and investigate into various objectionable materials and the offences committed by Dinesh, Advocate and take suitable action under law against him and persons involved in posting such objectionable posts. This action should be taken forthwith as the judiciary cannot be threatened by a single misdirected individual. The EOU will also investigate the involvement of other persons in this illegal activity.

7. On 17.12.2021, the action taken report should be filed before this Court and affidavit should be sworn by the A.D.G. himself and he will also be personally present before this Court.

8. Put up on 17.12.2021 (Friday) at Chamber through physical mode.

9. Mr. Pratap Sharma, practising as an Advocate in this Court has produced before this Court an F.I.R. registered by him in the Rajiv Nagar Police Station, in which local police has not taken any action. It is a cyber crime and the local police are not able to investigate the cyber crime and under such circumstances, this Court directs the EOU to investigate the Rajiv Nagar P.S Case No. 229 of 2021 and take it to its logical conclusion. For that, the EOU is granted one month’s time to file a report in this case before this Court.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top