ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI
Murari Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI, J.:–Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Special P.P., Mines and Minerals alongwith learned GA7.
2. The petitioner has asked for the following relief:—
“(i) For issuance of an appropriate writ commanding the respondents to clarify the area of land declared for mining of sand of Mauza Kishanpur, Block-1, Anchal Surajgarha, District Lakhisarai specifically to their Khata and Area so that the Raiyati Lands of the petitioners may not be included to the lands so demarcated for mining of sands, contained in Annexure-1.
(ii) For issuance of an appropriate writ commanding the respondents not to include the Raiyati lands of the petitioners in the sand mining area as declared in Mauza Kishanpur, Block-1, Anchal Surajgarha, District Lakhisarai.
(iii) For any other reliefs or reliefs for which the petitioners are entitled under law as well as on the facts of the case.”
3. However, under Para-4 of the petition has fully detailed respective survey plot numbers belonging to the petitioners.
4. No counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State but counter affidavit is on behalf of respondent no.3, the Collector, Lakhisarai as well as respondent no.4
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.