VIKASH JAIN, ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN
Anjana Kumari – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
VIKASH JAIN, J.:–Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents through video conference.
2. The present writ petition has been filed “for quashing of the order dated 30/8/2019 passed in OA No. 050/00300/2016 by the Hon’ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Branch, Patna by which Hon’ble Tribunal has disposed of the application filed by the petitioner with observation directing the petitioner to apply, if she so desires, for any similar post with the respondent department as suggested by the Hon’ble High Court in CWJC No. 10594/2010 and further in the nature of mandamus for directing and commanding the respondents to appoint the petitioner on the same post i.e. GDSBPM, Sahsi Branch Office where the petitioner had worked more than 18 years and after termination of the petitioner on the said post the said post is vacant for seven years waiting for appointment of one Ram Udgar Yadav who is an accused in criminal case due to which his joining has not been accepted and he is not being appointed in near future, hence the case of the petitioner may be sympathetically considered by this Hon’ble Court and further for any other appropriate relief or reli
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.