SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Pat) 1057

VIKASH JAIN, ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN
Anjana Kumari – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Subodh Kumar Jha.
For the Respondents: Ms. Kanak Verma.

VIKASH JAIN, J.:–Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents through video conference.

2. The present writ petition has been filed “for quashing of the order dated 30/8/2019 passed in OA No. 050/00300/2016 by the Hon’ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Branch, Patna by which Hon’ble Tribunal has disposed of the application filed by the petitioner with observation directing the petitioner to apply, if she so desires, for any similar post with the respondent department as suggested by the Hon’ble High Court in CWJC No. 10594/2010 and further in the nature of mandamus for directing and commanding the respondents to appoint the petitioner on the same post i.e. GDSBPM, Sahsi Branch Office where the petitioner had worked more than 18 years and after termination of the petitioner on the said post the said post is vacant for seven years waiting for appointment of one Ram Udgar Yadav who is an accused in criminal case due to which his joining has not been accepted and he is not being appointed in near future, hence the case of the petitioner may be sympathetically considered by this Hon’ble Court and further for any other appropriate relief or reli

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top