MADHURESH PRASAD
Md. Shamsher – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT
MADHURESH PRASAD, J.:–
Today being Friday, matters are being taken up through virtual mode as per current procedure for hearing.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned State counsel.
3. An advertisement for appointment on the post of Special Survey Amin was published by the respondents. The advertisement Number is 01/2019. The petitioner has submitted his application online under the procedure specified in the advertisement.
4. The petitioner’s grievance is that while entering his educational qualifications online, he committed two mistakes. The first mistake is that he has claimed his qualification to be issued by government institution. The second mistake that he has committed, is that he has claimed the qualification to be from a government institution in the State of Bihar.
5. The admitted position is that he has qualifications, but from a private institution, that also, in the State of Haryana.
6. It is, therefore, submitted by the petitioner’s counsel that the petitioner being qualified in terms of the advertisement, could not have been disqualified or
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.