SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Pat) 324

MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
Madan Kumar Das – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: M/s Raju Giri, Santosh Kumar Mishra.
For the Respondents: Mr. Manish Kumar.

JUDGMENT

MOHIT KUMAR SHAH, J.:–

The present writ petition has been filed for directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to present the sale deed for registration, appertaining to Mauza-Saifganj, Thana No. 103, Survey Ward No. 20, New Ward No. 27, Mohalla- Gami Tolla, P.S. and District-Katihar bearing Khata No. 206, Khesra No. 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 100, 107, 108 and 214 having total area of 8.28 acres.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is the Mahant of Sri Sri 108 Ati Prachin Udasin Sangat and the lands in question, with regard to which sale deed is to be executed, is under the control and management of the petitioner. The said land in question was purchased by a registered sale deed by the ancestor of the petitioner and the petitioner had sold a portion of the same to one Vashundhara Vihar Construction Private Limited by a registered sale deed dated 28.7.2014 (Annexure-2 to the present petition). The title of the petitioner is stated to have also been adjudicated by this Court in First Appeal No. 270 of 1996, which was filed by the petitioner against the judgment and decree dated 22.4.1996, passed by the learned Court of Sub-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top