Babita Kumari vs State of Bihar - 2022 Supreme(Pat) 587

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Pat) 587

MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
Babita Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sinha.
For the Respondents: Mr. Manoj Kumar.

Mohit Kumar Shah, J.—The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 31.7.2014, passed by the Director, Integrated Child Development Scheme, Bihar, Patna i.e. the Respondent No. 2 herein as also for quashing the orders dated 22.7.2011, passed by the District Magistrate, Purnea and the one dated 29.2.2012, passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Purnea in Miscellaneous Appeal No. 53/2012, whereby and whereunder the selection of the petitioner made on the post of Anganbari Sevika has been cancelled and the same has been upheld in appeal.

2. The brief facts of the case, according to the petitioner, are that the Mukhiya of Gram Panchayat called for a general meeting /Aam Sabha for selection of Anganbari Sevika on 22.6.2007 and a report was called for with regard to the prevailing confusion regarding the mapping of the castes, whereupon, it was found that in the village in question, Adivasis were in majority, hence directions were issued on 27.7.2007 for taking steps for preparing the merit list. The meeting of the Aam Sabha was again held on 30.7.2007 and a decision was taken to appoint the petitioner on the post of Anganbari Sevika, whereafter letter dated 2.8.2007

Click Here to Read the rest of this document