SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Pat) 663

DINESH KUMAR SINGH, ARVIND SRIVASTAVA
Arvind Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Kiran Devi – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant : Mr. Rama Kant Jha.
For the Respondent: Mr. Chandra Kant, Navin Kumar, Dhivendra Kumar.

Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.—Heard learned counsels for the appellant, respondent.

2. The present Miscellaneous Appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 16.3.2009 and 31.3.2009, respectively, passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Patna in Matrimonial Case No. 460 of 2007/59 of 2000, whereby the matrimonial suit filed by the appellant with a prayer for decree of divorce on dissolution of marriage between the appellant and the respondent on the ground of adultery and cruelty, has been dismissed with cost of Rs.5000/-.

3. It appears that the judgment and decree of the learned Principal Judge, Family Court was initially challenged in First Appeal No. 57 of 2009. The learned counsel for the appellant was permitted to convert the First Appeal into Miscellaneous Appeal vide order dated 1.7.2013 and consequently, it was numbered as Miscellaneous Appeal No. 525 of 2013. The Miscellaneous Appeal was dismissed by a bench of this Court vide order dated 13.5.2015 with a direction to make payment of 1/3rd pension of appellant husband to the respondent wife.

4. Subsequently, vide order dated 14.9.2015 passed in Civil Review No. 164 of 2015, the same bench recalled the judgme

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top