SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Pat) 1136

VIKASH JAIN, RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
Md. Rajjak @ Razzak – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant : Mr. Y.V. Giri, Sr. Adv., Kritya Nand Jha.
For the Respondent: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Ghosarvey.

Vikash Jain, J.—Heard learned senior counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the State.

2. The present Memo of Appeal has been filed by the appellant for setting aside the order dated 05.09.2019 passed in CWJC No.16146 of 2018 dismissing the writ petition.

3. The appellant was initially appointed as Constable on 02.09.2008 in the district of Bhagalpur. In course of discharging his duty, he was deputed along with four other officials at Vikramshila Bridge TOP, Bhagalpur. A charge memo was issued on the basis of video footage in which the appellant along with the four others was identified as making illegal collection from the trucks. The appellant was asked for his show cause, which was duly furnished. In the departmental enquiry, he was saddled with the punishment of dismissal from service by order dated 13.03.2018 by the Senior Superintendent of Police, Bhagalpur on the basis of report of the Enquiry Officer. Thereafter, the appellant preferred an appeal before the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Eastern Region, Bhagalpur, which was dismissed by order dated 11.05.2018. The appellant did not also succeed in the memorial preferred before the Director General of Police, B

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top