Jyoti Saran, J.—Heard Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Rajiv Roy, learned GP I for the State.

2. With the consent of the parties the writ petition has been heard with a view to finally disposal at the stage of admission.

3. The writ petition was initially filed questioning very initiation of the disciplinary proceeding vide order bearing Memo No. 1/2005 dated 17.3.2015 of the Director, Dairy Development Directorate, Bihar, Patna under the provisions of the Bihar Government Servants (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules'), a copy of which is impugned at Annexure 4 to the writ petition. While the writ petition is pending consideration that charges served on the petitioner vide letter dated 6.5.2015 of the Deputy Director, Dairy Development, impugned at Annexure 5, were examined in the disciplinary proceedings and the final order has been passed terminating the services of the petitioner vide order bearing Memo No. 437 dated 16.3.2016, impugned at Annexure 12 to I.A.No. 6127/2016, and even the appeal preferred by the petitioner has been dismissed by the appellate authority vide order bearing Memo No. 48 dat