Mandhata Singh, J. – Shortly stated prosecution case is that on the day of occurrence there appeared some altercation on the point of raising a ‘Tati’ of bamboo in between the lane of the parties’ house. It is said that all the accused-appellants variously armed with Lathi, Bhala, Gadasa and Farsa assaulted the informant and others. All the appellants faced trial which ended in their conviction for the offence under Section 324 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code. Appellant Nos.2 to 5 are further convicted for the offence under Section 148 of the I.P.C. and rest under Section 147 of the I.P.C. basing the statement of witnesses examined in the case as PWs-1 to 7 they are PW-1 Ram Bahal Rai, PW-2 Vishwanath Rai, PW-3 Sita Ram Rai, PW-4 Parmanand Rai, PW-5 Triyug Rai, PW-6 Pawan Kumar Singh and PW-7 Suresh Prasad.

2. Their further discussion is not needed in the case as conviction is not challenged in the case rather period of sentence only is submitted to be observed the period undergone by accused-appellants. The ground for such sympathy is submitted that for the occurrence of the same day a case was lodged against informant party by the accused party which also ended in c