SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Pat) 1558

ARVIND SRIVASTAVA
Rameshwar Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Dilip Kumar Roy, For the Petitioners; Mr. Manoj Kumar, For the Opposite Partys.

ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Baisi P.S. Case No. 223 of 2016 registered under Sections 379 of the Indian Penal Code and 21 (1)(2) of the Mines and Mineral (Development & Regulation) Act.

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case with ulterior motive. It is also submitted that they have valid documents with regard to the alleged vehicle. Further submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that as per sections 22 and 23A of Bihar Mines & Mineral (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957, only complaint can be lodged and the offence is compoundable.

4. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Purnea in connection with Baisi P.S. Case No. 223 of 2016, subject to the condition

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top