ARVIND SRIVASTAVA
Rameshwar Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Baisi P.S. Case No. 223 of 2016 registered under Sections 379 of the Indian Penal Code and 21 (1)(2) of the Mines and Mineral (Development & Regulation) Act.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case with ulterior motive. It is also submitted that they have valid documents with regard to the alleged vehicle. Further submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that as per sections 22 and 23A of Bihar Mines & Mineral (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957, only complaint can be lodged and the offence is compoundable.
4. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Purnea in connection with Baisi P.S. Case No. 223 of 2016, subject to the condition
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.