Dinesh Kumar Singh, J. – Heard Mr. Suresh Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Rakesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the O.P. Nos. 2 and 3.

2. The present application has been filed for cancelling the anticipatory bail granted to the O.P. Nos. 2 and 3 vide order dated 10.8.2015 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 32838 of 2015 on two grounds, firstly, that a statement was made in paragraph no. 3 of the criminal miscellaneous application to the effect that the O.P. Nos. 2 and 3 do not have any criminal antecedent and secondly, that a wrong submission was made that the case lodged by the daughter of O.P. No. 2, namely, Manisha Choudhary, being Darbhanga Mahila P.S. Case No. 40 of 2014 was lodged on 22.4.2014, at earlier point of time and considering the same, O.P. Nos. 2 and 3 were granted anticipatory bail by the impugned order.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the father-in-law of the daughter of O.P. No. 2 whereas O.P. No. 3 is the brother-in-law (Sala) of O.P. No. 2.

4. Factual matrix of the case is that the petitioner filed Complaint Case No. 488 of 2014 on 21.4.2014 against O.P. Nos. 2 and 3 and other family members levelling accusation under