Amreshwar Pratap Sahi. –

Re: I.A. No. 1 of 2019

After having heard learned counsel for the appellant, we are satisfied that sufficient cause has been shown to condone the delay in filing the appeal. The delay is condoned and the appeal shall be treated to be within time.

2. I.A. No.1 of 2019 stands allowed accordingly.

Re: L.P.A. No.508 of 2018

Heard Shri Sandeep Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant.

2. The appellant was a member of the Central Industrial Security Force and he has been removed from service on the ground that he sought entry in the service on the basis of a fake caste certificate dated 12th of April, 2000. The charge was sought to be enquired into and upon the conclusion of the disciplinary enquiry, the Disciplinary Authority on 20th of May, 2009 passed an order of removal of the appellant. An appeal against the same was dismissed on 30th July, 2009. The appellant preferred a revision that was rejected on the ground of limitation without touching the merits of the case.

3. Learned counsel submits that the charge as actually enumerated in the charge-sheet was of an allegation of manufacture of the document that was not proved. There is no evidence so as to conclude tha