BIRENDRA KUMAR
Rajendra Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Birendra Kumar, J. – Heard learned counsels for the parties.
2. The petitioners are accused in connection with Hasanpur Police Station Case No.43 of 2015 registered on the direction of learned Judicial Magistrate, under Section 156 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, on the basis of initial complaint filed vide Complaint Case No.1110 of 2014 by opposite party No.2.
3. The petitioners have challenged the order of cognizance dated 02.09.2015 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Rosera, whereby cognizance has been taken for the offences under Sections 406 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.
4. The challenge is on the ground that on bare perusal of the complaint petition, no offence is made out as well as on the ground that the learned Magistrate has passed the order under Section 156 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure in a mechanical manner, only mentioning on the top of the complaint petition as follows: –
^^Fkkukè;{k gluiqj] izkFkfedh ntZ djsaA vuqlaèkku dj vafre izfrosnu lefiZr djsaA**
5. Contention is that if the Magistrate would have applied its mind on the complaint petition, he must not have proceeded with the case and sent the matter for registration of a Pol
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.