Back
P. B. BAJANTHRI, PURNENDU SINGH
Prabesh Kumar Jha – Appellant
Versus
Life Insurance Corporation of India – Respondent
Purnendu Singh, J. – In the present appeal, appellant has assailed the order dated 07.03.2018 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 11678 of 2009 whereby and whereunder learned Single Judge was pleased to dismiss the writ application filed on behalf of the appellant.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant was appointed on 01.03.1985 on the post of Assistant in the Life Insurance Corporation of India. He joined Jhanjharpur Branch on 07.03.1985. He was promoted to the post of Assistant Administrative Officer (A.A.O) in December, 1999. The appellant submitted an application dated 06.07.2006 before the Zonal Manager, Kolkata through proper channel tendering his resignation from the service which was forwarded to the Manager, LIC of India, Muzaffarpur on 07.07.2006. The appellant submitted another letter addressed to the Branch Manager on 22.09.2006 with the prayer to accept his resignation as submitted earlier. The resignation was accepted and it was conveyed to the appellant vide letter dated 14.10.2006 by the Senior Divisional Manager, Muzaffarpur. The Divisional Office, Muzaffarpur made letter dated 07.12.2006 requesting the Branch Manager, LIC of India, Block Office, Jhanjharpur to
Resignation entails forfeiture of past service, making the employee ineligible for pensionary benefits.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the distinction between voluntary retirement and resignation, as well as the forfeiture clause under the Indian Overseas Bank (Employees') Pen....
Resignation and retirement have different legal implications, and the scope of a pension scheme may not extend to resigned employees.
The judgment established the distinction between resignation and voluntary retirement, upheld the disqualification of pensionary benefits in case of resignation, and emphasized that the petitioner kn....
An employee if has attained the age of 50 years and has spent 20 years of service, he would be entitled to seek voluntary retirement and so consequential benefits
An employee must fulfill the eligibility criteria, including completing the required years of service, to be entitled to pension benefits under the Pension Scheme, 1995. Additionally, approaching the....
(1) Pension – Entitlement to get pension must be fulfilled by concerned employee.(2) Voluntary abandonment of service is distinct from voluntary retirement.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
