SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 1023

A. ABHISHEK REDDY
Subhas Prasad Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: M/s Pankaj Kr. Sinha, Rajiv Kumar Singh.
For the Respondents: Mr. Suresh Kumar, AC to GP1.

A. Abhishek Reddy, J. – Heard the learned counsels for the parties.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for the following relief(s): –

“(i) Issuance of an appropriate writ/ writs, direction/directions and in the nature commanding of mandamus directing the of and respondents to dues amount make payment of Rs. pending before them 6,28,000/- since long causing serious injuries to the petitioner which has not been paid even after due agreement as has been made with the petitioner on 24.10.2005 though the major portion of the amount of about 90% have already been paid by the concern authority.

(ii) Any other relief/reliefs to which the petitioner is found entitled so.”

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that pursuant to the agreement entered between the parties, petitioner has completed the work entrusted to him i.e. construction of toilets. The authorities after being satisfied with the work done by the petitioner have paid 90% of the total bill amount but have till date not paid an amount of 6,28,000/- (Six Lacs Twenty Eight Thousand) which is 10% of the bill amount. Learned counsel has stated that inspite of several representations made and also the orders passed b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top