SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 1035

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
P. B. BAJANTHRI and RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA, JJ.
CWJC No.10950 of 2016
(7.11.2023)
M/s Globus Spirits Ltd. ... Petitioner
vs.
State of Bihar & Ors. ... Respondents

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: M/s Satyabir Bharti, Ashish Giri.
For the State : M/s Vikas Kumar, SC-11, Sriram Krishna, AC to S.C.-11.
For Beverage Corp. : M/s Vikas Kumar, Girijesh Kumar.

Headnote:

Government Contract – Payment – Petition for payment of sale price of country liquor – Concerned respondents have not passed any order either accepting or rejecting petitioner's claim and on the matter for last about six years – Petitioner hereby directed to file additional representation or application in support of claim including any decision of this Court and produce the same so as to enable concerned authority to decide claim of petitioner – Concerned authority hereby directed to take a decision while passing a detailed speaking order. (Paras 2 and 4)

P. B. Bajanthri, J. – In this petition, petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: –

“I. Directing the respondents i.e. the State Government/ Bihar State Beverage Corporation Limited to make payment of the sale price of country liquor totalling 122563.68 LPL valued at Rs.1,78,62,779.52, supplied by the petitioner to the Patna, Gaya, Aurangabad and Jamui Depots of Bihar State Beverage Corporation Limited under a statutory contract executed between the petitioner and the State Government;

II. To hold that the aforesaid inaction of the respondents in making payment of the supply price of country liquor which was supplied by the petitioner on a requisition made by the Bihar State Beverage Corporation Limited and orders of the State Government is illegal, arbitrary and unreasonable;

III. To direct the respondents to pay interest @ 18% on the aforesaid quantity supplied but not paid from March, 2016 till the date of its actual payment;

IV. For issuance of such other writ(s), order(s), direction(s) as your Lordships may deem fit and proper.”

2. In support of the aforementioned reliefs, petitioner has submitted letters dated 16.05.2016 vide Annexure-8 (series). The concerned respondents have not passed any order either accepting or rejecting the petitioner’s claim and on the matter for the last about six years.

3. Learned counsel submitted that in identical matter, this Court has allowed and certain payments have been made to the concerned parties.

4. Taking note of the these facts and circumstances, the petitioner is hereby directed to file additional representation or application in support of the claim including any decision of this Court and produce the same so as to enable the concerned authority to decide the claim of the petitioner read with the decision of this Court. The concerned authority is hereby directed to take a decision while passing a detailed speaking order and communicate the same. The above exercise shall be completed within a period of eight weeks from the date of the receipt of additional representation/application on behalf of the petitioner.

5. With the above observations, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top