SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, PARTHA SARTHY
State of Bihar – Appellant
Versus
Basant Prasad Singh, Son of Late Munsi Mahto – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Niraj Kumar
For the Respondent:Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

The appeal is by the State against the impugned judgment which set aside an order of punishment passed by the Director-in-Chief (Administration), Health Services, Bihar. The impugned order in the writ petition directed forfeiture of 100% pension of the petitioner for life.

2. The petitioner, who is the first respondent herein, was posted as a Head Clerk in the office of Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Aurangabad. He was alleged to have been caught by the flying squad of the District Anti-Corruption Team, Aurangabad on 10.06.2007 with a sum of Rs. 5,000/-alleged to be bribe received from one Auxiliary Nurse and Midwife (for brevity, ANM), in order to facilitate her transfer. A criminal case was also registered as Aurangabad P.S. Case No. 131 of 2007. The petitioner was taken into custody and a charge-sheet dated 03.07.2007 was served on the petitioner. Simultaneously, an Inquiry Officer was appointed and after the reply of the petitioner, the Inquiry Officer submitted his inquiry report, based on which the impugned order was passed. While the inquiry report was submitted on 13.02.2014 and the impugned order was passed on 16.02.2017; in the midst of it the petitione

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top