SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
Manoj Kumar S/o Late Bhikhari Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Ms. Indira Kumari, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Hitesh Suman, Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the Bihar School Examination Board (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Board’) as also learned counsel for the State.

2. This writ application has been filed seeking a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to pay a monetary compensation to the tune of Rs.10 lakhs to the petitioner no. 2 whose career and further prospect of studies has been marred by two years due to a totally irresponsible conduct of the affairs of the Board in the matter of publication of her result of Secondary School Examination, 2017 (Annual).

Case of the Petitioners

3. Petitioner no. 2 was a student of BLSSP High School, Narkatiya. She appeared in the Secondary School Examination, 2017 (Annual) conducted by the Board. Her result was published showing her ‘Fail’ in the compulsory paper of Sanskrit. She had otherwise secured 1st Division Marks in total in other four subjects.

4. It is submitted that the petitioner no. 2 who was minor at the relevant time was shocked and suffered humiliation despite the fact that she did not believe that she could have failed in the Sanskrit paper. The petitioner no. 2 filed an application und

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top