Karnataka HC Notices Sri Lankan Judge's Rights Plea
07 Mar 2026
Karnataka Proposes Social Media Ban for Under-16s
07 Mar 2026
Justice Dharmadhikari Sworn In as 55th Madras HC Chief Justice
07 Mar 2026
Punjab HC Acquits Ram Rahim in Journalist Murder
07 Mar 2026
Appellate Courts Can Rely on Unexhibited Public Documents Produced by Plaintiff: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
P. B. BAJANTHRI, ARUN KUMAR JHA
Vinay Kumar Rai S/o Late Braj Nandan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Central Bank of India through its Chairman-cum-Managing Director – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT :
P.B. BAJANTHRI, J.
1. In the instant LPA, the appellant has assailed the order of the learned Single Judge dated 09.05.2017 passed in CWJC No. 7345 of 2009.
2. The appellant while working as an Assistant Manager at Amwara Chowk Branch of Central Bank of India is alleged to have committed certain misconducts and was subjected to disciplinary proceedings.
3. Gist of the case as noted by the learned Single Judge reads as under:
The central legal point established in the judgment is the limited scope of judicial review in disciplinary matters and the importance of compliance with natural justice, evidence-based findings, and....
The scope of judicial review in disciplinary matters is limited, and the Court will not interfere with the findings of the disciplinary authority unless there is a violation of natural justice or the....
Disciplinary proceedings against a retired bank officer can proceed if initiated prior to retirement, identifying lapses in loan sanctioning as misconduct warranting penalties.
Court's role of judicial review in matters of Disciplinary Proceeding is circumscribed and unless a case is made out of patent illegality or gross perversity, Court would be loath to interfere with s....
Disciplinary proceedings against bank employees must adhere to established regulations, and decisions upheld by the appellate authority are not subject to re-evaluation by the High Court unless deeme....
The court upheld the disciplinary action against the petitioner for proven misconduct, affirming that the inquiry adhered to natural justice principles and the penalty of compulsory retirement was ju....
State of Karnataka vs. Umesh
-
Read summaryUnion of India and Others vs. P. Gunasekaran
-
Read summaryRavindra Nath vs. Chairman, Uttar Bihar Gramin Bank
-
Read summaryChairman and Managing Director, United Commercial Bank and Others vs. P.C. Kakkar
-
Read summary
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.