RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
Vinay Varma – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
2. Petitioner in the present case is seeking setting aside of the order dated 04.01.2019 passed by the learned Special Judge (Excise) Patna in Special Case No. 729 of 2017, arising out of Patliputra P.S. Case No. 148 of 2016 under Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code (in short ‘IPC’) and Sections 47(A) and 53(B) of the Bihar Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016 (in short ‘Excise Act’). By the impugned order, the learned court has directed the investigating agency to reinvestigate the case.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Patliputra P.S. Case No. 148 of 2016 was registered on the basis of a news published in various daily newspapers on 26.04.2016. The news were published on the basis of a sting operation said to have been conducted by a private channel wherein a Member of Legislative Assembly, namely Vinay Varma (petitioner), was shown saying that he has brands of various liquors, further that he was shown giving offer to the team carrying out sting operation for drinking. It is alleged that when he was asked by the sting team, he stated that how can he throw when he has. It is further alleged
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.