SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Pat) 549

P. B. BAJANTHRI, S. B. PD. SINGH
Shristi Kumari – Appellant
Versus
Sandeep Kumar Lohani – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Rama Kant Singh.
For the Respondent: Mr. Shashikant Amar.

S. B. Pd. Singh, J. – Heard the parties.

2. The appellant has come up in this appeal against judgment and decree dated 30.06.2016 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Gaya in Matrimonial Title Suit No. 92 of 2016, whereby the petition filed by the respondent-husband under Section 13(1)(i-a)(i-b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (in short 'the 1955 Act') seeking dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce, has been allowed and the respondent-husband was directed to deposit Rs. 10 lakhs as fixed deposit in favour of his minor daughter Ananya for her marriage and other purposes which was to be withdrawn by her at the time of any exigency with the permission of the Court.

3. Succinctly, the marriage of appellant was solemnized with the respondent on 09.06.2009 as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. The marriage was duly consummated and a female-child was born out of the wedlock.

4. The pleaded case of respondent-husband in his petition filed under Sections 13 (1)(i-a)(1-b) of the 1955 Act was that his marriage was performed with the appellantwife on 09.06.2009 as per customs and traditions prevailing in the community in presence of their elders and well wishers without any d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top