SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Cal) 140

RAMKRISHNA SHARMA, CHITTATOSH MUKHERJEE
Sankar Prosad Paul Chowdhury – Appellant
Versus
Madhabi Paul Chowdhury – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Surathi Mohan Sanyal, for Appellant.

Judgement

CHITTATOSH MOOKERJEE, J. :- On April, 1976 the appellant husband had filed a petition in the Court of the learned District Judge, Alipore under S.10 of the Hindu Marriage Act praying for a decree for judicial separation on the ground that the respondent wife had treated him with cruelty and that she had deserted him. After the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976 was enacted, the appellant husband applied in the trial court for amendment of his petition, inter alia, by substituting in place of the prayer for judicial separation a prayer for decree for dissolution of marriage under S.13 (1) of the Hindu Marriage Act. The trial court had allowed the said prayer for amendment. The respondent wife had contested the said suit, inter alia, denying the allegations of cruelty and desertion made by her husband.

2. The learned Additional District Judge, 7th Court, Alipore dismissed the said suit. Thereafter, the plaintiff husband has filed the present appeal.

3. On 10th April, 1981 the appellant petitioner filed an application in this Court praying that he may be permitted to amend his original petition for divorce by inserting para 14 (a). The respondent wife has opposed the appella














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top