A.M.BHATTACHARJEE, AJOY NATH RAY
Jogendra Nath Sen – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
A. M. BHATTACHARJEE, J.:- Notwithstanding my appreciation of and concurring in the judgment of my learned brother Ray, J., appearing hereinafter, I have thought it advisable to add a few words for more reasons than one. One reason is the importance of the question, on which our attention could not be drawn to any reported decision of this Court. Another reason is that at some places the precision of the observations of Ray, J., has almost reached the state of aphorism (Sutra), which may require some amount of amplification (Vasva), so that persons not trained in law, but more concerned with copy-right, like authors and publishers, may know where they are.
2. The work in question, being a book on Anatomy, is a literary work within the meaning of Clauses(y) and (o) of Section 2 of the Copyright Act, 1957 (hereinafter Act for short). The author of the work is therefore the first owner of the Copyright therein under Section 17 and when published in his lifetime, his right shall subsist until fifty years after his death under Section 22.
3. Under Section 14 of the Act, Copyright in a literary work, includes, among others, the exclusive right to publish the work. But the author, a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.