SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Cal) 144

BHAGABATI PRASAD BANERJEE, K.M.YUSUF, S.K.HAZARI
Mrs. Maria Desilva – Appellant
Versus
Austin Desilva – Respondent


Judgement

BHAGABATI PROSAD BANERJEE, J. :- This case has been forwarded by the trial Court for confirmation of the decree nisi for dissolution of the marriage under Section 17 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869. Notice could not be served as the husband has expired. The question in this case is whether the divorce suit abates after the decree nisi was passed under Section 16 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) and during the pendency of the matter before the High Court for confirma­tion under Section 17 of the Act the husband has died.

2. In this case the suit for dissolution was filed by the wife against the husband in Divorce Suit No. 94 of 1986 before the Court of the 11th Additional District Judge, Alipor and the learned District Judge at the first instance passed a decree nisi dissolving the marriage on the basis of an application under Section 10 of the said Act on the ground of adultery with desertion and adultery with cruelty.

3. When the matter came up before us for confirmation of the decree nisi under S. 17 of the Act we find from the service return that the husband died and under such circum­stances the question is whether this Court ca











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top