SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Cal) 306

GITESH RANJAN BHATTACHARJEE
Muchha Mondal – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P. C. Ghosh, for Petitioner; Jagabandhu Roy, for State.

Judgement

ORDER :- It is inter alia submitted by the learned Advocate for the petitioner that the petitioner obtained M.A. Degree through Correspondence Course from the Himachal Pradesh University and the University also issued necessary certificate in this respect in favour of the petitioner but the D.I. is not accepting the said Degree for approving the panel of English Teacher where the petitioner stood first. It is not understood why the M. A. Degree which has been awarded by a recognised University, even if through Correspondence Course, should not be recognised as M.A. Degree. It is further submitted on behalf of the petitioner that while in the Calcutta University the total marks for M.A. Examination in two parts is 800, in the Himachal Pradesh Correspondence Course Examination the total marks is not less than that. This is however immaterial. In a letter dated 28/29-9-93, written by the Deputy Registrar (Acad), Himachal Pradesh University, Simla which is annexure at page 33 of the writ application it has been stated that the Himachal Pradesh University has been established under the provisions of University Grants Commission regarding establishment of University, by an Act.










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top