SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Cal) 26

PARTHA SAKHA DATTA
Sabur Hossain Biwas – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Kollol Basu, Mahinoor Rahaman, for Petitioner; Abhijit Adhya, for Respondent.

ORDER :- The learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. 2 at Basirhat in the district of 24 Parganas (N) was trying the S.T. No. 3(7) of 2005 corresponding to Swarup Nagar P.S. Case No. 71 dated 6-8-2003 against the present petitioner under Section 376/417 of the IPC and after framing of charge, 14 witnesses were examined, cross-examined and discharged. Thereafter on 9-8-2007 the learned Public Prosecutor, in-charge of the case filed a petition before the learned Judge praying for DNA test of the victim girl, of the present petitioner and the child born of the girl. The learned Judge allowed the petition holding that if the DNA test is done it would almost conclusively determine the paternity or otherwise of the accused-petitioner in respect of the child and it was observed in the impugned order dated 17-8-2007 that this was the proper way of arriving at the truth. The impugned order reveals that similar petition was also filed before the predecessor of the learned Presiding Judge, but that petition was rejected on the ground that allowance of the petition would amount to interference with the investigation of the case. Since the investigation was over and trial was in



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top