SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Cal) 659

JYOTIRMAY BHATTACHARYA
Manager, UCO Bank – Appellant
Versus
Samar Sarkar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Aniruddha Roy, Rupak Ghosh, P. C. Ghosh, for Petitioner.

ORDER :- This application under Art. 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against an order being No. 19 dated 19th September, 2006 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), 1st Court at Sealdah in Title Suit No. 205 of 2004 by which the application of the defendant No. 3/petitioner for rejection of the plaint under O. 7, R. 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure was rejected by the learned Trial Judge.

2. The plaintiff/opposite party No. 1 filed a suit for declaration of his tenancy right under the defendant/opposite party No. 2 herein. A further declaration was also sought for against the said defendant for declaring that he cannot be evicted without due process of law. So far as the petitioner, as well as the opposite party No. 3 herein are concerned, the following relief was claimed by the plaintiff in the plaint :

"The respondent No. 2 or 3 or their agents and officers be restrained from forcibly evicting the plaintiff from the scheduled flat."

3. The said reliefs were claimed by the plaintiff on the basis of the following averments made out by the plaintiffs in the plaint of the said case.

1. The plaintiff took tenancy of the disputed flat from the defendant No. 1 in















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top