SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Cal) 785

KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA
Gyananendranath Shil – Appellant
Versus
Superintending Engineer – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
K. Jayapal, for Petitioner; S. K. Mandal, for Administration.

ORDER :- This writ petition is directed against an order passed by the Superintending Engineer, Electricity Department, A and N Administration, who in compliance of the order passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court dated 5-3-2007 has decided not to give connection of the domestic electric supply line to the premises of the petitioner.

2. It is appropriate to record the relevant portion of the direction given by the learned single Judge earlier :-

"......

Regarding electric connection, this Court directs the Superintending Engineer, Electricity Department to take effective steps for providing the petitioners house with electricity since this Court is satisfied that the title suit filed by the neighbours of the petitioners is not in respect of the property in question. In the event the respondent No. 4 is of the opinion that the electric connection cannot be given to the petitioners without hearing the neighbours, he shall be at liberty to give notice to the neighbours and hear them before effecting such connection. If for any reason supply cannot be given, he shall pass a reasoned order."

3. The petitioner is asking for electric connection to the building erected and/or situat










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top