BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA AND TAPAN KUMAR DUTT, J.
Smt. Arati Mondal – Appellant
Vs.
Bhupati Mandal. - Respondent
F. A. No. 235 of 2005
Decided on : 22-4-2009
Divorce - Hindu Marriage Act - Section 13(1)(1a) - The court discussed the allegations of cruelty and the evidence presented by both parties. The court found that the wife's baseless allegations of extra-marital affairs and her deliberate false plea of extra marital affairs involving the husband constituted mental cruelty, leading to the grant of a decree for divorce.
Fact of the Case:
The wife filed for divorce on the ground of cruelty, alleging physical and mental torture by the husband. The trial court found in favor of the husband, granting a decree for divorce.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the wife's baseless allegations of extra-marital affairs and her deliberate false plea of extra marital affairs involving the husband constituted mental cruelty, leading to the grant of a decree for divorce.
Issues: The issues revolved around the allegations of cruelty, the opportunity to prove documentary evidence, and the inability to prove the husband's alleged bad moral character.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that unfounded and baseless allegations made in defense in matrimonial proceedings can constitute grounds for divorce, even if such grounds were not initially mentioned in the petition. The deliberate false plea of extra marital affairs involving the husband was considered a form of mental cruelty.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the appeal and affirmed the judgment and decree passed by the trial court, granting a decree for divorce in favor of the husband.
BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, J. :- This first appeal is at the instance of a wife in a proceeding for divorce on the ground of cruelty and is directed against the judgment and decree dated 28th April. 2004 passed by the learned Additional District Judge. Tenth Court, Alipore, in Matrimonial Suit No. 20 of 1995 thereby granting a decree for divorce.
2. The respondent before us filed a proceeding under Section 13(1)(1a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 thereby giving rise to Matrimonial Suit No. 116 of 1993 claiming divorce on the following allegations:
(a) The parties were married according to Hindu customs on 9th March. 1970 and in the said wedlock, four issues, three daughters and one son, were born.
(b) After the marriage, the parties lived together as husband and wife at the residence of the husband at village Kalikapur (Uttar), P.O. Dakshin Barasat, Police Station Joynagore.
(c) The husband was an employee of Central Bank of India. He was very adjustable man and always used to try his best to ad• just with not only his wife but also all the family members.
(d) The wife was adamant and obstinate lady. Since 1980, she used to quarrel with her husband and disobey the husband in various ways with the help and inspiration of her father, brother, sister.
(e) The husband tried his best to adjust with his wife for the sake of his children but it was unfortunate that the wife misguided them against their father in various ways and taught them to disobey their father from the very childhood.
(f) With the conspiracy and instigation of the wife. her father. brother and other associates came into the house of the husband in the month of July. 1992 with an ulterior motive and assaulted the husband mercilessly but narrowly he escaped and saved his life. He was medically treated and on the basis of such incident, an FIR was lodged in the local police station and a criminal case was started against the father and brother of the wife and they were charge-sheeted. The said case is still pending.
(g) After the said incident, the ill-treatment and the misbehaviour of the wife became intolerable day-by-day. Off and on, with the instigation of the brother and other relatives, the wife always demanded money from the husband and while he failed to pay such amount of money, the wife with the help of her brother and other relatives started torturing both physically and mentally.
(h) The wife on several occasions without taking any consent used to go out from the house and spend the whole day outside and if the husband asked the reason, the wife picked up quarrel with the husband and abused in most filthy language.
(i) On several occasions, the husband was assaulted by the wife with the help of her brother and antisocial for which the husband sustained severe injuries on his body and for the sake of peace he was bound to leave his house and to stay at different places for considerable period for maintaining his duties and neverthelss, he sent money to his wife and children for their maintenance regularly.
(j) The husband to save himself lodged several diaries to the local police station being G.D. Entry No. 962 dated 19th April. 1992, 120 dated 2nd June, 1992, 326 dated 6th July, 1992, 1074 dated 23rd August, 1992, 943 dated 17th June, 1993, 772 dated 15th June, 1993. 2214 dated 27th November. 1994
(k) The wife instigated her brother and father for committing breach of peace, as a result, the husband was compelled to file a petition under Section 107 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against his father-in-law and brother-in-law. Being satisfied, the learned Magistrate was pleased to admit the petitioner and to ascertain the facts, called for report from the officer-in-charge concerned. After such enquiry, the police submitted report which was in favour of the husband and the case was registered as M.P. Case No. 373 of 1992. The husband was compelled to file another application under Section 107 of the Cr. P.C. against the wife apprehending breach of peace whic
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.