SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(Cal) 22

SUDHAMAY BASU
BANK OF BARODA – Appellant
Versus
FISHCO – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.DAS, A.K.SEN, C.R.DUTTA, Mrigen Sen

SUDHAMAY BASU, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition it appears for lie fourth time, for leave to amend the written statement filed in this suit. The suit itself was instituted as far back as 14th of June, 1962. The original written statement was filed on the 27th of August, 1962. More than tight weeks thereafter when the suit appeared in the list for hearing the defendant sought to amend the written statement. Two applications for such amendment -- one dated 22nd January, 1973, and the other dated 23rd February, 1973, were withdrawn with leave of the Court to file fresh applications. On the 22nd March, 1973 the third application was filed for amendment to incorporate as paragraphs 10 (a) and 10 (b) of the written statement the following :--"10 (a ). The said transactions relating to the said 8 letters of credit are unlawful and smenforceable in that the transactions as aforesaid were contrary to and in violation of, inter alia, Sections 3, 4, 5, 6, 21 and 22 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act. 1947 of India. 10 (b ). The said transactions were contrary to the laws relating to Foreign Exchange Regulation of Pakistan, namely, I. R. P. X. 4. "the said application for amendment was partial







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top