SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(Cal) 51

SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE, SANKAR PRASAD MITRA
INCOME-TAX OFFICER, "E" WARD – Appellant
Versus
RALEIGH INVESTMENT CO. LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.L.PAL, D.GUPTA, Debi Pal, M.SEAL, SUHAS SEN

SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal relates to the assessment for the assessment year 1966-67 under the Income-tax Act, 1961. On the 16th of February, 1967, the original assessment was made under Section 143 (3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. In the said assessment tax was computed as payable by the petitioner-company on the basis of 25% of the dividend income of Rs. 16,01,769 and the taxable figure arrived at was Rs. 4,00,442'26. After giving the petitioner credit for the tax deducted at source on this account the tax liability of the petitioner was nil on this amount. Thereafter, on the 26th December, 1967, supplementary assessment was made under Section 143 (3) read with Section 147 (a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, to include the capital gains arising as a result of the sale of 2,14,174 shares of Rs. 10 each to Vazir Sultan Tobacco Co. Ltd. On the 15th of February, 1968, an order was passed under Section 154 of the Act on the ground that there was a mistake in the calculation of tax. In the said order in recomputing the tax, the tax on dividend income was calculated at 25% as was made in the original assessment. Thereafter, on the 5th of January, 1970, another Income-tax Of






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top