SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(Cal) 201

SANKAR PRASAD MITRA, M.M.DUTT, AMAL KRISHNA DE
BIMALA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
AGHORE CHANDRA MALLICK – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BHASKAR GHOSH, SATYA CHARAN PAIN, SATYAJIT BANERJI

( 1 ) IN this reference the facts are that on the 5th January, 1965, Title Suit No. 83 of 1959 in the Subordinate Judge's Court at Alipore for the recovery of money due on a mortgage bond was decreed. The decree-holder thereafter started execution proceeding, being Title Execution Case No. 2 of 1965. On August 4, 1965, the petitioner's first bid was not accepted. Two days later the petitioner's bid was accepted and the sale took place. The opposite party No. 1 on the 4th September, 1965, filed an application under Order 21 rule 90 of the Code of Civil Procedure in the First Court of the Subordinate Judge at Alipore which was registered as Miscellaneous Case No. 51 of 1965. was dismissed for default on the 7th May, 1966,and the sale was confirmed on the 10th May, 1966. The opposite Party No. 1 filed an application on May 17, 1996, under section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure for reserving the order to dismissal for default made on the 7th May, 1996. Possession was delivered to the petitioner on the 31st May, 1966; but the application under section 151 was allowed, the order of dismissal was set aside and the Miscellaneous Case No. 51 of 1965 was restored to file by an order of t





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top