SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(Cal) 202

SALIL KUMAR DATTA, B.C.RAY
BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF CALCUTTA – Appellant
Versus
CALCUTTA IMPROVEMENT TRIBUNAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARUP DAS, BHABANI PRASUN CHATTERJI, SHIBA SANTI HAJARA

DATTA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal against the judgment and order of Anil Kumar Sen, J. dated March 23, 1973 discharging the rule obtained by the Board of Trustees for the Improvement of Calcutta (hereinafter referred to as the Board) against an award made by the Tribunal constituted under Section 70 of the Calcutta Improvement Act. 1911 for performing the functions of the Court in reference to the acquisition of land for the Board under the Land Acquisition Act 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal ). The acquisition of the lands in dispute was made under the Calcutta Improvement Act, 1911 which incorporates some provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 including Section 23 (1) and (2) subject to modifications provided therein.

( 2 ) BY Section 74 (c) of the Calcutta Improvement (Amendment) Act. 1955 (West Bengal Act XXXII of 1955) which came in force on October 20, 1955 before sub-paragraph (2) of paragraph 9 of the Schedule to the Act, the following sub-paragraph was inserted-"paragraph 9. (1) Sub-section (2) of Section 23 shall be deemed to be omitted. "

( 3 ) THE Tribunal in the view that it was bound by the decision in Balammal v. State of Madras, held the above


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top