SALIL KUMAR DATTA, B.C.RAY
BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF CALCUTTA – Appellant
Versus
CALCUTTA IMPROVEMENT TRIBUNAL – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is an appeal against the judgment and order of Anil Kumar Sen, J. dated March 23, 1973 discharging the rule obtained by the Board of Trustees for the Improvement of Calcutta (hereinafter referred to as the Board) against an award made by the Tribunal constituted under Section 70 of the Calcutta Improvement Act. 1911 for performing the functions of the Court in reference to the acquisition of land for the Board under the Land Acquisition Act 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal ). The acquisition of the lands in dispute was made under the Calcutta Improvement Act, 1911 which incorporates some provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 including Section 23 (1) and (2) subject to modifications provided therein.
( 2 ) BY Section 74 (c) of the Calcutta Improvement (Amendment) Act. 1955 (West Bengal Act XXXII of 1955) which came in force on October 20, 1955 before sub-paragraph (2) of paragraph 9 of the Schedule to the Act, the following sub-paragraph was inserted-"paragraph 9. (1) Sub-section (2) of Section 23 shall be deemed to be omitted. "
( 3 ) THE Tribunal in the view that it was bound by the decision in Balammal v. State of Madras, held the above
Dhulabhai v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Deputy Commr.and Collector Kamrup v. Durganath Sarma
Nagpur Improvement Trust v. Vithal Rao
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
REFERRED TO : Balammal v. State of Madras
K.S.Venkataraman and Co.P.Ltd. v. State of Madras
Jullundur Rubber Goods Manufacturers Association v. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.