SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(Cal) 305

SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE, A.K.JANAH
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX – Appellant
Versus
SARALA DEBI BIRLA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.L.PAL, D.PAL, P.K.MAJUMDAR, R.N.BAJORIA

SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, J.

( 1 ) THIS reference relates to a question involved in the wealth-tax assessment for the assessment years 1964-65 and 1965-66. The relevant valuation dates were 31st March, 1964, and 31st March, 1965, respectively. The assessee had made a gift of Rs. 1,00,011 to her minor daughter, Kumari Manjushree Birla, on the 7th of October, 1959. Applying the provisions of Section 4 (1) (a) (iv) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, the Wealth-tax Officer had included the said amount in the net wealth of the assessee for the said two years. The assessee preferred an appeal before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. It was contended that the sum of Rs. 1,00,011 was exempt under the proviso to Section 4 (1) (a) introduced by the Act 46 of 1964. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner negatived this contention and upheld the order of the Income-tax Officer on this point. The assessee preferred an appeal before the Tribunal contending that the sum was exempt from the levy of wealth-tax under the proviso to Section 4 (1) (a) because she had paid gift-tax with reference to the said amount. It was contended on behalf of the revenue on the other hand that the proviso would only apply to








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top